I doubt that many users would want every single mixbus to be oversampled enough to handle that. I do wish to make clear that the aliasing is not the fault of the developers. The effect is much less pronounced at higher sample rates. Both peaks should be moving together to the right, when one of them begins to diverse and move towards the left This is aliasing. You can also see that harmonic reflect off the nyquist frequency and move left as the input signal continues to move to the right. So this means that if you have the tape saturation knob at 0.0, then everything below 400hz will have odd harmonics generated, and above 400hz it will only be third harmonic. 6.0 saturation you basically always get odd harmonics.This appears to be a simple saturator that adds odd harmonic content for parts of the signal odd harmonic generation is: SendsĮach mixbus in Mixbus 32c has a tape saturation process. I’ve rarely used it when mixing, but it’s come in handy when trying to tame some very sharp percussive elements that were causing pumping in another compressor down the signal chain later. It doesn’t let any signal pass the threshold. The limiter is exactly what you’d expect from a limiter. The limiter exhibits no saturation beyond what would be expected from a dynamics processor.You can see the fixed 200ms stage in both, with the top having a very fast hump showing the second stage and the middle having a smooth transition from the first stage. In the images above the top is a 1ms release time and the middle is 225ms. The first stage is a fixed ~200ms, followed by the second stage which is close to the labelled value. The limiter appears to have a 2 stage release. The release is variable with the default labelled value as 15ms at 12 o’clock.With an input of -18dbFS, the signal was reduced to a peak of -20dbFS. The limiter has a fixed ratio and attack. Let’s just dive in and go through what the Mixbus 32c mixer offers. Each channel has a selection of features that optionally can be sent to a mixbus with a number of features that goes to a master bus with a number of features which can optionally go through a monitoring section with a number of features. The mixer in mixbus is not your typical digital summing box. I don’t think that this is necessarily the best use of Mixbus, since it’s a fantastic full-fledged DAW in its own right, however it is one of the best aspects of Mixbus. Mixbus is often seen as a program that, after doing all of your work in another DAW, you drop in stems and mix with.

Harrison mixbus v5